Recognized authority
Directory rankings, awards, named contributions to trade publications. The harder they are to fake, the heavier the model weights them.
Use case · Professional services
Law, accounting, consulting, architecture. The buyer’s first move is increasingly a chat. Models lean on directories, awards and trade press to answer — and the answers get repeated across thousands of prompts. Intendity tells you whether you’re named.
The prompts
Same questions buyers used to ask their network — now asked of an assistant. The answer comes back as three to five firms with one-line credentials each.
Professional-services prompts are recommendation-style. Models default to authority signals more aggressively than they do for SaaS or e-commerce.
Directory rankings, awards, named contributions to trade publications. The harder they are to fake, the heavier the model weights them.
"Best X in [city]" prompts dominate. Models look for proof you actually serve that market — local press, project case studies, regional accreditations.
For specialist prompts, models weigh published expertise: white papers, regulatory commentary, named partners associated with the topic over multiple years.
The pool is narrower than in SaaS or e-commerce. Influence is concentrated in directories and trade press, with thought leadership rising fast.
Chambers, Legal 500, Best Lawyers, IFLR for legal; Bloomberg Tax for accounting; Architectural Record for architecture. Models trust ranked directories disproportionately for "best of" answers.
Industry awards translate to model trust. A "shortlisted in 2025" line on the right page changes the framing of every comparison answer.
For market-specific answers ("best X in [city]"), local trade press carries weight. A profile in a respected regional outlet propagates across answers for that geography.
High-leverage for senior partners and named firms. Even a stub article with sourced citations changes how models describe expertise areas.
Original research, white papers, regulatory commentary on your domain — with proper schema — get cited as primary sources rather than aggregator content.
Increasingly cited for individual-expert framing. Less weight than directory placement, but high impact for a named partner’s authority signal.
Each tied to a specific source — the directory listing, the award page, the white paper that’s currently shaping (or losing) the answer for your category.
Audit which directories cite for your category. Fill the placement gaps; correct outdated firm summaries; ensure award pages are linked back to your domain with proper schema.
Models answer "best X in [city]" with hyper-local logic. Track each market separately; localized PR placements compound where the gap is largest.
Publish original research with proper Article and Author schema. Models cite primary sources before aggregators — and your firm becomes one for adjacent prompts.
Senior-partner bios with Person schema, awards, named publications. Models cite individuals as much as firms for "who should I work with" prompts.
Track sentiment around regulatory matters, litigation outcomes or client departures. Catch a damaging narrative early; coordinate the source-level corrections that matter.
Use prompt coverage to find adjacent practice areas where you’re plausibly named but not yet cited. Targeted PR and content investment closes the gap quickly.
Five minutes from sign-up to your first AI visibility report. Free plan available.